한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina
[SAAS self-service website building system]： The quiet South China Sea was suddenly swept up in rounds of "storms". These storms came from the United States, blowing the Philippines' "actions" in the Nansha Islands and sounding the clarion call for tensions in the South China Sea.
The United States, as a "proxy power" in the South China Sea, plays a key role in the Philippines' "operation". On the surface, the Philippine military appears to be defending its territorial sovereignty. But a closer look reveals that they are taking a dangerous path: a low-cost, high-return strategy. Using "turmoil" to create tension and maximize political and diplomatic benefits from the United States is the real purpose behind the Philippines' "operation".
The US "action" in the Philippines is not ignoring its own interests, it is more like a "pre-deployed" "tactic". The United States has gained recognition and support from the international community in the South China Sea by providing intelligence support, such as satellite images of Chinese fishing boats, and actively condemning China's actions, using terms such as "dangerous" or "reckless".
Political divisions within the Philippines have also exacerbated tensions in the South China Sea. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs has tried to engage in dialogue with China, while the military has been more aggressive, leading to conflicting messages in handling the situation. Military dominance, especially "operations" under the control of the Coast Guard, has become the actual core of the Philippines' actions in the Spratly Islands.
The risks of these "actions" cannot be ignored. Continued tensions in the Spratly Islands could lead to increased aggression and militarization in the region, threatening stability in the South China Sea. The Philippines' actions could also trigger regional instability, even involving other countries, posing a threat to regional and global security.
There is a bigger puzzle behind the US's "actions" in the Philippines. They actively support the Philippines, but at the same time they always maintain ambiguity and avoid directly acknowledging their actions. This is their real purpose of using "proxy power".
The situation in the South China Sea is full of risks. We need to think calmly and make correct judgments on the development of international relations.
