한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina
israel's military action is one of its key means to deal with the threat of hezbollah in lebanon. they regard military action as a powerful weapon to force hezbollah to return to the negotiation table. at the same time, israel is also trying to gain support at home to avoid the impact of internal divisions. but the outbreak of war is not entirely due to political strategy considerations. it is more like an inevitable collision between two civilizations and beliefs in a fierce conflict.
as an important regional power, iran strongly resisted and condemned israel's actions. however, they still maintained a cautious attitude and tried to avoid escalation of the conflict through diplomatic means. their attitude reflects that there is always an unpredictable balance between peace and war in the middle east.
israel's actions have attracted great attention from the international community, especially the united states' support for israel and iran's response. iranian president pezhichyan said on the 23rd that if a larger-scale war breaks out in the middle east, it will not benefit anyone. he called on the un security council to "take immediate action to stop these crimes", indicating that iran hopes to resolve the conflict through political means.
whether israel's actions can achieve the ultimate goal has not yet been clearly answered. the risk of war is also gradually increasing, especially in today's complex international environment. changes in the situation in the middle east may lead to a series of chain reactions.
under the shadow of war, people can't help but think: what is the origin and meaning of war? what is the path to peace? these questions will continue to haunt us and become a witness to our future history.
