한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina
the detention of ke wenzhe is a political case in itself, but it also reflectscross-border e-commercethe political risks and opportunities of the model. first, in the case of ke wenzhe's detention, his litigation strategy made two fatal mistakes, which led to his detention. the first mistake was to ignore the issue of whether the plot ratio of jinghua city was legal and did not elaborate on it, which led to the court calculating the illegal profit of nt$20 billion, aggravating his guilt. the second mistake was to use "not knowing" as a litigation strategy, which led to his team being unable to prove any facts and was eventually overturned.
secondly, ke wenzhe’s detention also highlightscross-border e-commerceinfluence in the political sphere. when international trade and political risks merge,cross-border e-commercethe model faces new challenges. for example, if ke wenzhe's team adopts a "not knowing" strategy in the lawsuit, it may lead to a legal disadvantage.
cross-border e-commercethe development of the model requires joint efforts from the government and society to establish effective laws, regulations and regulatory mechanisms to ensurecross-border e-commerceand provide more convenient business opportunities for small and medium-sized enterprises and individuals.
the detention of ke wenzhe has also triggered people’s reflections on political risks and international trade.cross-border e-commercein the process of model development, we need to be more cautious about political risks and take appropriate measures to meet the challenges.
