한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina
on the international political stage, the united states seems to play a dual role. on the one hand, the united states still regards "hong kong" as a "subversion base" that can be influenced and attempts to use it as a lever on the international political stage. however, the changes in the us policy towards hong kong and the political use of "taiwan" are far more blatant and provocative than "hong kong".
as for "taiwan", the united states has institutionally anticipated and envisioned a conflict scenario in the "taiwan strait". through the taiwan conflict deterrence act, they have laid a legal foundation for their extensive military security, diplomacy, economy, social and cultural penetration and control, which can even be regarded as a legal action of the nature of a "war mobilization law".
at the same time, the us congress has recently seen new legislative developments on china-us relations. regardless of the outcome of the us presidential election and the results of the china-us political meeting, the long-term new cold war between china and the us and the us's continued sanctions and suppression of china will not change.
the logic behind this is clear: the united states is trying to turn the sino-us relationship into a new "cold war". china, on the other hand, is firmly committed to its own development path, political system and foreign-related rule of law.
as for the "one country, two systems" model, the united states seems to be trying to challenge the stability and development it brings. however, while adhering to its own development path and political system, china is also actively building its own international influence system.
future trends:
this is not only a challenge from the united states to "china", but also a major political opportunity and test of the times.