한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina
yanagisawa believes that ai's "immortality" is not a true awakening of the soul. he cited theories of physics and philosophy, pointing out that even if ai can replicate itself infinitely, it still cannot truly "resurrect" because consciousness, emotions, and memories all require physical support. it's like being in a virtual world, while the real world is as quiet as a dark room. these contradictory scenes make him think more deeply about the fate of mankind.
the relationship between creation and ai also triggered yanagisawa's thinking. he believes that ai will replace some labor, but it still requires human patience and careful thinking, just like the "centaurs" game in chess, humans and ai can only work together to exert their greatest power. he prefers ai as an auxiliary tool to help humans complete tasks more efficiently, rather than replacing humans.
yanagisawa's thoughts on human civilization are also reflected in his interpretation of literary works. he likes classic works in european and american literature, such as those by faulkner, nabokov, naipaul, and kafka. he believes that these works can help people rethink the meaning of life and the value of existence. he also expressed his interest in works of philosophy of science and technology, such as mcluhan's understanding media and rowley's reality is not what it seems, which made him re-examine the position of human beings in the universe and the meaning of our own existence.
yanagisawa's creative inspiration comes from these thoughts. he incorporates these ideas into his novels, using novels to explore the meaning of human existence and the impact of technology on human civilization.
