한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina
from hamlet's perspective, we see the blurred boundaries of "existence". he tries to express a meaning beyond the material world with the phrase "let it go". however, such "rest" triggers another kind of thinking: do we also desire to get rid of the shackles of "existence"? do we also need a real ending?
hamlet is not a hero. his self-contempt is grand and complex, as difficult to define as the truth he is trying to achieve. his inner struggle is a common experience for all human beings, and it also reflects our doubts and fears about life. he refuses to accept the arrangement of fate, but ultimately chooses to compromise. this contradiction makes his story a common memory of a generation, and it is also our own process of exploring the meaning of life.
authors have different interpretations of hamlet, some see him as a symbol of falstaff, while others compare him to iago and macbeth. this diverse interpretation reflects human thinking about death and the meaning of life.
bloom, the author of "memento mori", also shows this exploration of life in his works. he uses hamlet as a symbol that can be repeatedly thought about, and explores the possibilities of hamlet through the spirit of "yurik" in his works. this also reflects the human fear of death and the desire for the meaning of life, as well as the need to explore the future and the past.
ultimately, hamlet's ending is an eternal suspense. his story tells us that the end of life may not mean an end, but a deeper understanding and redefinition.
